![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
BUY GOLDS!
Oct. 25th, 2010 01:31 am
(no subject)
Nov. 16th, 2009 11:37 pm
And this one reason why I am so upset with our government. I'll bet there weren't any provisions in the bill to deny benefits for Viagra or Cialis, either.
(no subject)
Nov. 4th, 2008 10:50 pm
i'm so happy! i am so very proud of my country, for the first time in eight years.
my initial debate analysis:
Oct. 7th, 2008 09:28 pmboth candidates mentioned the holocaust. GODWIN'S LAW. both candidates lose.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif){kind=small}
politicartoons
i voted for kerry, by the way
Nov. 29th, 2006 03:27 amBush Nuts
Are George W. Bush lovers certifiable?
also:
Are George W. Bush lovers certifiable?
"A collective “I told you so” will ripple through the world of Bush-bashers once news of Christopher Lohse’s study gets out.
Lohse, a social work master’s student at Southern Connecticut State University, says he has proven what many progressives have probably suspected for years: a direct link between mental illness and support for President Bush.
Lohse says his study is no joke. The thesis draws on a survey of 69 psychiatric outpatients in three Connecticut locations during the 2004 presidential election. Lohse’s study, backed by SCSU Psychology professor Jaak Rakfeldt and statistician Misty Ginacola, found a correlation between the severity of a person’s psychosis and their preferences for president: The more psychotic the voter, the more likely they were to vote for Bush."
also:
"'Our study shows that psychotic patients prefer an authoritative leader,' Lohse says. 'If your world is very mixed up, there’s something very comforting about someone telling you, "This is how it’s going to be."'
The study was an advocacy project of sorts, designed to register mentally ill voters and encourage them to go to the polls, Lohse explains. The Bush trend was revealed later on."
found here
Nov. 22nd, 2006 06:03 am1994: Republicans sweep into control of Congress, including picking up a 26-seat margin in the House. Not a single Republican incumbent anywhere loses.
Media conventional wisdom: The country has given the Republican agenda a broad mandate, and decisively rejected the Democrats.
2006: Democrats sweep into control of Congress, including picking up a margin of at least 26 House seats, probably more. Not a single Democratic incumbent anywhere loses.
Media conventional wisdom: A pox on both their houses. The voters have rejected partisanship, and want both parties to work together.
1994: Incoming House Speaker Newt Gingrich backs a political ally for Majority Whip, who goes on to lose to Tom DeLay for the post.
Media conventional wisdom: It doesn't matter; Newt is still the man. He's hailed as probably more powerful than President Clinton. Time Magazine names him "person of the year."
2006: Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi backs a political ally for Majority Leader, who goes on to lose to Steny Hoyer for the post.
Media conventional wisdom: Pelosi seriously blew it. She's damaged goods, now. She cannot plausibly lead.
Liberal media, my tailfeathers.
Media conventional wisdom: The country has given the Republican agenda a broad mandate, and decisively rejected the Democrats.
2006: Democrats sweep into control of Congress, including picking up a margin of at least 26 House seats, probably more. Not a single Democratic incumbent anywhere loses.
Media conventional wisdom: A pox on both their houses. The voters have rejected partisanship, and want both parties to work together.
1994: Incoming House Speaker Newt Gingrich backs a political ally for Majority Whip, who goes on to lose to Tom DeLay for the post.
Media conventional wisdom: It doesn't matter; Newt is still the man. He's hailed as probably more powerful than President Clinton. Time Magazine names him "person of the year."
2006: Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi backs a political ally for Majority Leader, who goes on to lose to Steny Hoyer for the post.
Media conventional wisdom: Pelosi seriously blew it. She's damaged goods, now. She cannot plausibly lead.
Liberal media, my tailfeathers.
(no subject)
Nov. 6th, 2006 03:17 pmeveryone, go vote tomorrow!!! if you're registered to vote, there's no excuse for you not to do so.
don't know who the candidates are/what they stand for? do some research online. you have all night to do it.
don't know where to vote? san angelo readers, call the number 325-659-6541 and give the nice person that answers your name and birthdate, and they'll tell you.
your vote really does matter.
please, please, please everyone go vote tomorrow. this directly affects you. it's your government.
don't know who the candidates are/what they stand for? do some research online. you have all night to do it.
don't know where to vote? san angelo readers, call the number 325-659-6541 and give the nice person that answers your name and birthdate, and they'll tell you.
your vote really does matter.
please, please, please everyone go vote tomorrow. this directly affects you. it's your government.
election day is november 7th. it doesn't matter who you vote for, as long as you vote.
jesus christ, all of you need to watch this.
what the fuck is happening to our country?!
[Error: unknown template video]
also
[Error: unknown template video]
WHY ARE WE LETTING THIS HAPPEN?!
what the fuck is happening to our country?!
also
WHY ARE WE LETTING THIS HAPPEN?!
