spooky_nine: (Default)
spooky_nine ([personal profile] spooky_nine) wrote2005-05-26 05:20 pm
Entry tags:

peta kills animals

from: peta kills animals

i'm so tired of peta. older entry: things you didn't know about peta if you want to be a vegetarian, even though i feel it's inherently wrong, do it. your choice, your body. but don't feel so high and mighty about yourself. you're just as bad as the rest of us.

"Hypocrisy is the mother of all credibility problems, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has it in spades. While loudly complaining about the "unethical" treatment of animals by restaurant owners, grocers, farmers, scientists, anglers, and countless other Americans, the group has its own dirty little secret.

PETA kills animals. By the thousands.

From July 1998 through the end of 2003, PETA killed over 10,000 dogs, cats, and other "companion animals" -- at its Norfolk, Virginia headquarters. That's more than five defenseless animals every day. Not counting the dogs and cats PETA spayed and neutered, the group put to death over 85 percent of the animals it took in during 2003 alone. And its angel-of-death pattern shows no sign of changing.

On its 2002 federal income-tax return, PETA claimed a $9,370 write-off for a giant walk-in freezer, the kind most people use as a meat locker or for ice-cream storage. But animal-rights activists don't eat meat or dairy foods. So far, the group hasn't confirmed the obvious -- that it's using the appliance to store the bodies of its victims.

In 2000, when the Associated Press first noted PETA's Kervorkian-esque tendencies, PETA president Ingrid Newkirk complained that actually taking care of animals costs more than killing them. "We could become a no-kill shelter immediately," she admitted.

PETA kills animals. Because it has other financial priorities.

PETA raked in nearly $29 million last year in income, much of it raised from pet owners who think their donations actually help animals. Instead, the group spends huge sums on programs equating people who eat chicken with Nazis, scaring young children away from drinking milk, recruiting children into the radical animal-rights lifestyle, and intimidating businessmen and their families in their own neighborhoods. PETA has also spent tens of thousands of dollars defending arsonists and other violent extremists.

PETA claims it engages in outrageous media-seeking stunts "for the animals." But which animals? Carping about the value of future two-piece dinners while administering lethal injections to puppies and kittens isn't ethical. It's hypocritical -- with a death toll that PETA would protest if it weren't their own doing.

PETA kills animals. And its leaders dare lecture the rest of us. "

[identity profile] aj-h04.livejournal.com 2005-05-28 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
The combines move slowly enough they should be able to get SOMEWHERE other than under it.

[identity profile] aj-h04.livejournal.com 2005-05-28 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
you eat cows, so why are you worried about them?

[identity profile] aj-h04.livejournal.com 2005-05-28 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
You know I am just doing this to argue right? Just because there are vegetarians and they are a minority of americans doesn't mean that people should bash them. They are just as guilty as anyone else, yes. but, they do it for the mind frame I guess. Some people just feel guilty about KNOWING they are eating meat, they may know they are eating it but they can't see it infront of them, so to THEM, it makes it better.

[identity profile] spooky-nine.livejournal.com 2005-05-28 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
for the umpteenth time:

"this post wasn't against vegans/vegetarians alone. that was just a side beef (heh heh) i have. it was against peta, mostly. i don't think you caught the difference, or maybe i didn't make it clear enough. everything i've posted is factual, and backed up w/ sources. even maddox's rather rude page about it has cited sources."

[identity profile] spooky-nine.livejournal.com 2005-05-28 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
what?

[identity profile] spooky-nine.livejournal.com 2005-05-28 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
i'm stunned by your convoluted logic. none of your comments matter. it happens. i don't know why the animals aren't faster, or smarter than harvesting equipment. maybe it's the for the same reason that humans are at the top of the food chain.

regardless of why or how it happens, it does happen. millions of animals are killed during harvesting. you can dispute fact. but i'llbet you try.

[identity profile] dullglitter.livejournal.com 2005-05-28 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Well maybe people should guard gates to feilds better. that would eliminate the problem.

[identity profile] spooky-nine.livejournal.com 2005-05-29 05:33 am (UTC)(link)
then where would the animals live? people just don't care enough to keep the animals out of the fields.

[identity profile] unholy-zahrim.livejournal.com 2005-05-29 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok lets see, so if we did away with combines people would stop griping about the animals being killed by them ever harvest season. But then what about the animals killed by cars and things of that nature? Should we do away with the mechanics all together and regress back to a state of slave labor in the fields and ox and cart for travel?
Look we all have to just deal with the fact that alot of our choices screw up the surroundings of our world. If you dont wanna deal with it, become amish and move on.