'Restricted' isn't the same as 'the taxpayer doesn't pay for them'. The taxpayer doesn't buy me new cars either; that doesn't make my access to driving 'restricted'
Also, the conditions you listed above are a) life-threatening and b) cause thousands and thousands of dollars to finance. But $450? Really? I'm meant to get upset over that? Salon probably paid her more than that to write an article whining about it. Or why not hit up the guy who impregnated her and threaten him with 18 years of child support payments unless he chips in?
I've paid more than $450 in the last year on procedures that I was no way responsible for (genetic, or caused by childhood damage) and you don't see me crying about it in Salon.
no subject
Also, the conditions you listed above are a) life-threatening and b) cause thousands and thousands of dollars to finance. But $450? Really? I'm meant to get upset over that? Salon probably paid her more than that to write an article whining about it. Or why not hit up the guy who impregnated her and threaten him with 18 years of child support payments unless he chips in?
I've paid more than $450 in the last year on procedures that I was no way responsible for (genetic, or caused by childhood damage) and you don't see me crying about it in Salon.